By Stephen Jay Schwartz

I used to think I knew him. And his cousin, Jack. But now, after forty-five years, I realize I don’t know Diddly Squat or Jack Shit.

I’d like to think I’ve become smarter over the years. Maybe I’m just more handy. Like, I’ll know how to turn off the gas the next time there’s an earthquake. And I can hail a taxi in New York City at rush hour. These are things I now know.

But there’s something bigger that confounds me. It’s this thing we’re all doing here. This thing called Life.

And what’s weird is that I had it all figured out when I was eighteen. Life was a simple through-line, no subplots. Hero takes journey, faces zero obstacles, succeeds. Everybody loves him.

I think the first sign that things would be different came when I was twenty years old and my dad killed himself. That, in the movie business, is what’s called the End of Act One.

Hence came drama and escalating action. It’s been twenty-five years since, and I’m still deep into Act Two. I suppose I should be happy about that. I want to stay in Act Two as long as possible. Ultimately, some terrible crisis will propel me into Act Three, and we all know what happens after that. The End.

Throughout Act One and much of Act Two I insisted I had learned the way things worked. With each knew year of life came greater understanding of the great mysteries I had encountered. I gave simple, pat answers for what were truly complex questions. I actually thought the question, “Why is the sky blue?” required a scientific answer. Worse yet, I thought it could be answered at all.

I’ve always been drawn to the people who asked the questions, as opposed to the people who provided the answers. In college I was drawn to Jack Kerouac and writers of the Beat Generation because they questioned authority. I was drawn to Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters, to Timothy Leary, to Abbie Hoffman, because they, too, questioned authority.

But the Angry Young Man energy that fueled my interest in people who questioned authority gradually settled, and I started to see the many different sides of the complex problems in life. I realized that the world didn’t really exist in black and white, bad guys versus good guys. I found that I occasionally empathized with the authority figures. Sometimes what they were fighting for made more sense to me than the rest.

As my anger subsided, my awe for life’s unanswerable questions overwhelmed me. I realized I would never know the answers. So why not focus on asking great questions?

And that is how a work of art is defined in my mind. The exploration of life—through oils, charcoal, sound waves, digital bytes, film emulsion, words on a page…

I am not impressed by a well-told story, if that story only tells the actions of plot and relates the feelings of fear, anger, love or anxiety that directly result from that plot. If the story is only the perfect execution of dramatic structure, I might as well take a nap. I get excited when I witness the question asked anew: “For Godsake what is this thing called Life???” When that question vibrates off the page, I get excited. I want to see how other writers approach this. I want to see how they handle it in memoir, thriller, crime fiction, fiction and science fiction. It’s what makes Asimov so appealing. His short story “Bicentennial Man” wasn’t just about a robot trying to fit in, it was about the African American struggle for equality in the 60s. Asimov’s work is always about so much more than the crafty execution of plot.

I think people yearn for guideposts in their lives. I know I do. I read books in hopes that some new wisdom will be revealed to me, that the author will, with taste and subtlety, leave little breadcrumbs behind so that I might find my way. And when I recognize this quality in a writer’s work, I stand up and scream his or her name from the tops of the roofs. I want everyone to know of them.

One of the extraordinary things about my debut year is that I’ve had the opportunity to meet writers whose work gives me this sense of awe. My conversations with them fill me with optimism. We are travelers together, we occupy the same raft, and yet our experiences are vastly different, and our survival stories unique. I enrich my journey through the experiences they share through their art.

I hope my own work contains the qualities I look for when I reach for something to read. One never knows. One can only try.

If any of you happen to meet Diddly or Jack along the way, I’d love an introduction.

12 thoughts on “SQUAT

  1. MJRose

    Great post – if your book has that kind of passion and asks those kinds of questions I’ll buy a copy. I’m with you on not needing to read another book that’s all good execution and story telling if there’s not that underlying need buried in between the lines.

  2. Stephen Jay Schwartz

    MJ, Billie, Chuck – thanks for your comments. I’m going to be out on the road today and I won’t have an opportunity to participate in the discussion except for short, short notes from my iPhone. I’ll be able to jump back in tonight.

  3. Shannon Esposito

    Yes. Yes. Yes! I always thought the writers who delved into these hard questions were the literary ones, but then I found science fiction and then mysteries and thrillers. And it’s just like you said, everyone has a different story to tell because no two people have the same experiences in life. But no matter what genre the story falls into, the ones that I fall in love with are the ones that dig deeper into human experience, question it and provide a glimse of the writer’s own perspective.

  4. JT Ellison

    Stephen, seems to me you have it all figured out. There are no answers, only questions. That’s why we make up stories, to find some kind of resolution. I wish you a long and fruitful act 2.

  5. Pari Noskin Taichert

    In addition to the heartfelt points of your post, I wonder if you’re also attracted to the incredible reality of ambivalence — of those shades of gray rather than the black/white?

    I remember the moment I realized this world had little certainty, that the answers I’d been told/the questions I’d been TAUGHT to ask, didn’t really amount to much of anything. For a time I screamed against the fact that things weren’t as clearly defined as I’d been raised to think they were. I was really pissed.

    Then I caught a glimpse of the possibilities . . .

  6. Stephen Jay Schwartz

    I’m back and internet-active again. It feels good to be back at my favorite cafe with my Murderati friends only a keystroke away.

  7. Timothy Hallinan

    Sensational post, Stephen. I can’t wait to read Boulevard, and I guess I’ll be able to start after tomorrow night’s event at Book Soup. For all of you in the LA area, Stephen will launch BOULEVARD tomorrow evening at 7 PM at Book Soup, on Sunset, Should be a terrific night,

    The whole idea of writing to answer questions, or maybe just to explore them, appeals to me. If they were answerable, life would be a lot less engaging, and we’d all be out of material in no time. It’s possible for a writer to ask the same question in a dozen books and answer it differently every time. And every answer is valid and true within the latticework of the book it’s asked in.

  8. Stephen Jay Schwartz

    Thanks for the comment, Tim. I agree with you on everything you said except for the date of my book launch — which is SEPTEMBER 16, at Book Soup. I hope to see everyone in September!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *